Skip To Main Content

Search Panel

Schools Menu

School Improvement Plan

What is a School Improvement Plan?

A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.

Key Points of a SIP:

  • Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
  • Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
  • Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
     

The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.

Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.

Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.

District - School Improvement Plans

 

Front of Creekside Elementary School

Creekside Elementary School Improvement Plan

2024-2026

Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities

Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality

ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities. 

ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following: 

  • Institutional racism and ableism 
  • Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education 
  • Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)  
  • Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs 
  • Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs 
  • Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education 

Reflection & Theory of Action

Backed by Data

Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.

Data Workbook for Elementary School

Note:

  • The BIPOC Focus group includes students in the 4 federal race groups with ongoing disproportionate outcomes: Native American, African American, Hispanic, and Pacific Islander.
  • Students with Disabilities includes students with an Individual Education Plan, served in Special Services programs.
  • *OSPI has not released official attendance data as of the date of completion of this form, December 2024.

School-Based Action Plan

Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS).  For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies, including the Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy, and at least one other from district-wide program or system listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy. Launch new literacy curriculum that integrates science of reading strategies with comprehension strategies for all students to engage in close reading of grade level text. ISD Priority 2a,c

Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a

Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning.   ISD Priority 1

Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) through classroom-based interventions, coordination of supplemental programs, in implementation of block scheduling. ISD Priority 2b

Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in  a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Action Implementation Impact: Evidence/Monitoring

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy

Training

  • All staff will participate in ISD district training
  • All teaching staff will meet on a determined schedule with the school implementation specialist
  • Grade level release days to work with the implementation specialist on implementation
  • Training parents through a literacy event to learn about Benchmark Advance and how they can support literacy at home

Teaming

  • Grade-level teams will meet monthly to analyze data from week 2 e-assessments. Students will be assessed in metacognition, comprehension, vocabulary, writing, grammar, language, word study, and fluency.
  • Students should be able to score 70% in all areas accessed by end of the school year, which will indicate mastery in each category.  Teams will look at students who fall below this score in any one or more category and will discuss possible tier 1 and tier 2 interventions (i.e. Benchmark small group, I-Ready, whole class lesson). 

Integrity of Delivery

  • Use of implementation goals provided by Benchmark / Teaching & Learning Services
  • Collaboration in planning the literacy blocks

Resources Allocation

  • Implementation specialist (district)
  • Dedicated staff meeting time to training & collaboration
  • Commitment of team meeting time
  • Grade levels will meet at least monthly to discuss the implementation of Benchmark. The team will discuss the strengths and weaknesses occurring.  Additionally, conversations will occur about pacing to ensure that all instructors are within 2-3 lessons of each other.
  • Tier 2 team members will also be offered an invitation to the meeting. to help guide discussions on pacing, Special Education, ML, and the social emotional needs of the students.

Intended Impacts

  • Increase in reading decoding, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension
  • Increase in proficiency with grammar, writing structure, and effective communication of ideas in writing
  • Acceleration of achievement in key gap areas including phonics, overall reading, written expression

 

Key Data

  • i-Ready Phonics & Overall Reading
  • Achievement of stretch growth goals / accelerated growth for students scoring below standard in fall/prior spring.
  • Maintaining proficiency for students scoring at standard (level 3) in fall/prior spring.
  • Progress as monitored through embedded assessments:
    • Benchmark Performance Tasks
    • Benchmark week 2 assessments for each unit
    • RFS Assessments and Title/LAP progress monitoring

 

 

Tiered Teams

Teaming

  • Tier 1 team- leadership team, meets two times a month. The leadership team’s focus is discussing challenges and successes of school wide MTSS initiatives. This team is made up of grade level representatives and specialists. This team also supports the Comprehensive school counseling program (CSCP).
  • Tier 2/3 team- meets weekly. This team is made up of interventionists, academic support staff, school psychologist, counselor, and administration. The tier 2/3 team’s focus is reviewing school wide data on behavior, academics, and social emotional skills. This data is used to identify students in need of tier 2/3 supports. The team also reviews data from those students who are already receiving tier 2/3 supports to determine success of interventions and next steps. This team also supports the Comprehensive school counseling program (CSCP).

Training

  • Tier 2/3 team to train the building on utilizing SWIS, SAEBRs, and our tier 2/3 process.
  • Work with the MTSS TOSA, SLP, OT, and other specialist/support staff for tier 1, 2, and 3 training for all staff

Integrity of delivery

  • Work with the MTSS TOSA to ensure our processes are effective, efficient, and consistent school wide.
  • Collaborate with the MTSS TOSA to strengthen the tier 2/3 process and implement new interventions based on student need
  • To ensure effective interventions, it is crucial to identify the root cause of performance challenges. This means analyzing academic assessments to determine whether the issue stems from an academic skill gap or is influenced by social-emotional factors that affect academic outcomes. For example, difficulties may arise from a need for support in areas such as test-taking strategies, time management, focus, coping skills, or goal setting. By distinguishing between these underlying causes, we can tailor interventions to meet students' specific needs, ensuring that both academic and social-emotional barriers are addressed effectively.

Resources Allocation

  • Dedicated PD and staff meeting time to training and collaboration
  • Commitment of team meeting time
  • Staff to facilitate meetings
  • Intervention resources and materials (IE sensory tools, academic support materials)

Intended Impacts

  • Increase positive behaviors to enhance learning
  • Acceleration of achievement in key gap areas including phonics, 3-5th grade SBA math, and attendance

Key Data

  • Tiered fidelity inventory for tier 1 and 2
  • i-Ready math and reading
  • SWIS
  • SAEBRs
  • Attendance
  • Health room visits
  • Counselor referrals
  • Identifying students who are not meeting standards and are not making growth
  • Disaggregated data sets to ensure equity of representation in interventions

Enhance schoolwide system of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create conditions for learning

Teaming

  • At the start of the year, the leadership conducted a comprehensive review of our Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) framework, focusing on our school wide expectations system and how incentives are structured. With input from staff, we re-committed to the use of Otter Awards and enhanced our schoolwide systems of support (recognition at the individual student level, recognition at the classroom level, and recognition at the school level). 
  • The primary goal is to promote social-emotional learning (SEL), enhance student well-being, and foster a sense of belonging, creating optimal conditions for learning.
  • The leadership team will quarterly to assess the effectiveness of these systems, ensuring they continue to meet the evolving needs of our student body.

Training

  • The building leadership team will train staff on the updated system. 
  • Data from both SWIS (School-Wide Information System) and Otter Awards will be regularly shared during staff meetings to monitor progress and adjust as necessary.

Student implementation

  • Communication to students was delivered through a schoolwide video, ensuring that all students received a unified message about the program and its expectations.
  • Teachers will be provided with a student-facing PowerPoint to use as a tool for reteaching or reinforcing the program, ensuring its sustainability throughout the year.
  • Students will also have opportunities to provide feedback on whole-school rewards when the collective goal of 1,000 Otter Awards is reached, ensuring student voice is part of the process.

Resources

  • Otter Awards were created and distributed to all staff members for implementation.
  • A clear list of reward options at each level or tier was included in the PowerPoint presentation to ensure staff understand the progression of incentives.
  • Awards are color-coded by staff group to facilitate data collection and analysis. The groups include:
    1. Teachers and related certificated staff
    2. Specialists
    3. Paraeducators and Custodians
    4. Office Staff, Counselors, and Administrators

Intended Impacts

  • Increase Positive Behaviors: Strengthen positive behavior across the school to enhance the overall learning environment.
  • Integrated Support System: Create a cohesive, schoolwide support system that is both proactive and responsive to student needs.
  • Foster a Positive School Culture: Establish and maintain a positive, inclusive school culture where all students feel valued.
  • Sense of Belonging: Ensure that all students, regardless of background, have a sense of belonging and are actively engaged in the school community.
  • Positive School Experience: Provide every student with a positive and enriching school experience that supports both their academic and emotional well-being.

Key Data

  • Tiered Fidelity Inventory: Regular assessment of the PBIS system's fidelity to ensure it is implemented effectively and equitably.
  • Otter Awards Data: Collection and analysis of Otter Awards distributed to identify trends and areas for improvement.
  • SWIS Referrals: Monitor the number and type of behavior referrals to track improvements in student behavior.
  • SAEBRS (Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener): Use the SAEBRS data to gauge students' sense of well-being and make informed adjustments to the program.
  • Attendance: Track student attendance rates to assess the impact of a positive school culture on student engagement.
  • Health Room Visits: Monitor visits to the health room as an indicator of student well-being and potential areas of concern.
  • Counselor Referrals: Analyze counselor referral data to identify students in need of additional support and ensure timely intervention

Additional School Improvement Plan Components

Family engagement

ISD Priority 4

Family Engagement Nights

  • Family engagement nights like our literacy night, Benchmark Advance family night, and PTSA events will include resource sharing and opportunities for families to engage with staff and the community in a welcoming, inclusive environment.

Multilingual Communication

  • Provide resources for literacy and math either in other languages or in formats that can be easily translatable.
  • Ensure use of translators for family meetings and events.

Family Support for Families of Students with Disabilities

  • Provide resources to families to support learning at home.
  • Provide regular communication through multiple channels like meetings, phone calls, emails, and other communication methods.

Intended Impacts

  • These events aim to foster trusting relationships between families and the school, empowering parents to actively participate in their child’s education.
  • The goal is to remove barriers that prevent families from engaging with the school.
  • These efforts are designed to ensure families of students with disabilities feel empowered and informed about the educational process, leading to better collaboration between home and school.

Key Data

  • Increase in student attendance
  • Increased participation in school events by families

 

Technology Integration

Personalized Learning

  • Teachers use district technology tools such as Seesaw, Book Creator, Microsoft tools, and Canva to present content in multiple ways and to allow students to demonstrate mastery using multiple means of expression. These adaptive learning platforms enable teachers to utilize Universal Design for Learning principles, which in turn help close gaps for students disproportionately impacted by one-size-fits-all instruction.

Access to Resources

  • Teachers use tech tools to provide widespread access to learning materials, including standards-aligned online lessons via Zearn, Benchmark, Amplify, or i-Ready, e-books via Learning Ally or Sora, or age-appropriate digital research databases such as PebbleGo or TrueFlix. Access to these resources continues outside the school day, removing barriers for families and allowing students opportunities for additional review and practice of new skills and concepts.

Assistive Technologies

  • Teachers use tools like speech-to-text, screen readers, and customizable user interfaces help students with disabilities or language barriers to fully participate in learning, promoting inclusivity and equity.

Project-Based and Creative Tools

  • Creekside teachers utilize multimedia creation tools (Seesaw, Book Creator, Canva, Microsoft tools), coding environments (BrainPop coding, code.org), and collaborative software (Microsoft Teams, Book Creator) give students varied ways to express learning. These tools foster creativity and give students from diverse backgrounds more opportunities to succeed beyond traditional methods. 

Intended Impacts

  • Increase student engagement in learning.
  • Reduce barriers and provide access to learning.

Key Data

  • Track data usage through Clever
  • I-Ready and Benchmark Assessments to track the impact on student learning
  • Tracking academic outcomes for students who are using technology as part of a tier 2 intervention

School Improvement Team & Procedure Information

Principal

Amy Allison

SIP Team Members

Samantha Helfen, Kindergarten Teacher

Joy Hartmann, 1st Grade Teacher

Samantha Caiarelli, 2nd Grade Teacher

Kim Goodman, 3rd Grade Teacher

Liz Yanev, 4th Grade Teacher

Trevor Peden, 5th Grade Teacher

Stephanie De Jesus, SAGE Teacher

Sarah Kwateh, LRC Teacher

Karen Nelson, ML Teacher

Makinlee Smith, PE Teacher

Kylie Massey, Counselor

Patti Skurski, Assistant Principal

Supervisor Review

Susan Mundell- November 14, 2024

Site Council or PTSA Review

October 21, 2024

School Board Review

December 3, 2024